Search for: "United States v. March" Results 621 - 640 of 10,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 11:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” In reaching its decision, the Court reaffirmed its holding in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am by John Bellinger
  In a short but carefully-structured opinion issued March 2, Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California held that the plaintiffs’ claims do not “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:11 am by Nicholas Mosvick
Just a year before Prigg in 1841, Story penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
Putting the lie to DOJ fear mongering that the crack retroactivity amendment will put thousands of violent criminals prematurely back on the streets, the judge in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:19 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Tussey v ABB, Inc., an excessive fee and revenue sharing case decided on the last day of March after a full trial before the United States District Court for the District of Western Missouri, is a remarkable decision, imposing extensive liability for acts involving the costs of and revenue sharing for a major plan, on the basis of extensive and detailed fact finding. [read post]