Search for: "United States v. Minnesota" Results 621 - 640 of 1,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 3:00 pm by Kurt J. Schafers
Berthel filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Investors were not Berthel's "customers" under the FINRA Code and that Berthel was therefore not obligated to arbitrate with the Investors. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm by Sherrilyn Ifill
  The Supreme Court has played a huge role in intensifying this problem – beginning with the Court’s ill-considered 5-4 decision Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:45 am
[Washington Post] Sponsored Topics: Saudi Arabia - Middle East - Lindsey Graham - United States - Government [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by Sevens Legal
Franken took to the Senate floor to make his announcement, saying, “I am announcing that in the coming weeks I will be resigning as a member of the United States Senate. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
In the absence of controlling United States Supreme Court authority, we are bound by the Oregon Supreme Court, not the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm by Nikki Siesel
To resolve this issue, one party must demonstrate they used the mark in commerce before the other party, thereby entitling that party to register the trademark at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
  The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota agreed with the plaintiffs, declined to exercise jurisdiction, and remanded the case to state court. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 12:19 pm
Minnesota and Oregon provide for the right to counsel prior to chemical testing in their respective State Constitutions as well. [read post]