Search for: "United States v. Ronald Like" Results 621 - 640 of 710
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am by Giovanni Comandé
Dear ColleaguesI hope you find useful to have the links to the new issue of OPINIO JURIS in COMPARATIONE. once again we look forward to host contribution from our Juris Diversitatis group.If you have problems to read the post, please let me know.With my bestsciaoGiovanni #ssrnholder { font-face: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10px; } #ssrnholder #outline{ border-style: solid; border-width: 1px; border-color: #003366; max-width: 700px; } #ssrnholder table{ max-width: 700px;} #ssrnholder… [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 am by Lawrence Solum
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 117 S.Ct. 2365, 138 L.Ed.2d 914 (1997), and New York v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by LindaMBeale
  NY State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
Like all federal cases, Perry started in a District Court, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 9:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Currently, the technological crime units of CSIS and the RCMP report threats to Public Safety Canada. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
”[2] And Nobel Prize-winning economist Ronald Coase argued 50 years ago that “The phrase… lacks any definite meaning. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In each of the five most recent cases, the United States Supreme Court majority has been at pains to emphasize that "well before our decision in Penry I, our cases had firmly established that sentencing juries must be able to give meaningful consideration and effect to all mitigating evidence that might provide a basis for refusing to impose the death penalty[.] [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:50 am by michael a. livingston
Citizens United is indeed a somewhat reckless (if also predictable) decision; and there is something odd about a State Senator who supported the Massachusetts health reform getting elected by opposing its Federal equivalent. [read post]