Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 621 - 640 of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am by Steve Brachmann
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The NCC's podcast on "The Constitutional Legacy of Watergate" is here.Lawbook Exchange’s August 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman explain What [They] Did and Did Not Argue in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 7:42 am
Smith, 27 M.J. 242 (C.M.A. 1988); United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 19-8844. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” Peralta was ordered removed on June 7, 1999.Peralta returned regularly to the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
The Smiths and Judge Moore were certainly trailblazers, paving the way for legal precedent supporting the LGBTQ+ community for years to follow.The full text of the decision can be found here: Smith v Avanti. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:42 pm
United States, No. 06-7949 and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:38 am
 But the trial judge nonetheless allows the jury -- including Juror No. 6 -- to render a guilty verdict on two of the four counts.The United States Supreme Court has held that it's not reversible error to accept a verdict from a juror who gave "honest though mistaken" answers during voir dire. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 5:07 pm
Here is the direct video link to the 9/6/06 oral argument before the Supreme Court in Amy Smith v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm by Harry Styron
Smith of Ripley County, Missouri, declared some state regulations regarding deer hunting to be unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]