Search for: "United States v. Stamps"
Results 621 - 640
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
In making the announcement, the FTC said: “The Federal Trade Commission has stopped an Internet scheme that allegedly used bogus “free” product offers that deceived consumers in the United States and other countries and charged them for products and services they did not want or agree to purchase. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
In making the announcement, the FTC said: “The Federal Trade Commission has stopped an Internet scheme that allegedly used bogus “free” product offers that deceived consumers in the United States and other countries and charged them for products and services they did not want or agree to purchase. [read post]
TX4: State didn't call officer and relied on his report and failed in its burden of proving exigency
18 Feb 2012, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:25 am
In that case, Bank of New York v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:13 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 168 (1962)). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:03 pm
” In Judulang, the Court addresses whether a lawful permanent resident who had been in the United States for nearly 30 years could be removed based on a 1989 voluntary manslaughter conviction. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:26 am
The Yaz law suits have created a nightmare for its victims and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that is supposed to be safeguarding Americans taking this dangerous medication. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:29 pm
United States, No. 11-0462-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
" Elliott v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:52 pm
That’s why I was pleased to see a passionate, though short, dissent in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
It simply rubber-stamped the decision of the local authority without exercising its inquisitorial function properly or at all. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
It simply rubber-stamped the decision of the local authority without exercising its inquisitorial function properly or at all. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
., a church in which, as the United States Supreme Court expressed it in its 1872 decision in Watson v. [read post]
