Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 621 - 640 of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
The cease and desist order can enjoin defendants from certain activities within the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The teachers appealed to the Appellate Division.In a 4 to 1 ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, agreed with the lower court.The court applied a two-part test set out in Liverpool CSD v United Liverpool Faculty Asso., 42 NY2d 509. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the collective bargaining agreement… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am by Will Aitchison
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]