Search for: "Unknown Defendant No. 1" Results 621 - 640 of 2,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 9:13 am
Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a)(1) fn. 2 provides: "Any person who has been convicted of a felony . . . and who owns, purchases, receives, or has in his or her possession or under his or her custody or control any firearm is guilty of a felony. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Ted Folkman
The court denied the motion as to those defendants whose addresses were unknown. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by INFORRM
The Appeal The Claimants appealed their award of damages while the Defendant cross-appealed the finding of liability. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:51 pm
However, a subsequent petition will not be barred if (1) the facts underlying the claim were unknown to the defendant or the defendant's attorney and could not have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence prior to the filing of the earlier application, and (2) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would have reasonably led the original trier of fact to have either found the defendant not… [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:38 pm by Eric Goldman
Miller named 500 Festival and FedEx as defendants. 500 Festival and FedEx defended on Section 230 grounds. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
However, the value of the case should not be overstated since the defendants did not respond to any correspondence nor did they contest the court hearing. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Plaintiffs challenged Beauvais’s story about buying storage units, and also argued that “[m]ysterious found goods of an unknown origin and unknown nature does not prove a first sale enabling [d]efendant to sell product as new[.] [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
In the Russian case, the defendants are not actually government employees. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
Counsel also spent an extensive amount of time successfully defending a proceeding for the revocation of the letters of administration issued to the Public Administrator. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
In evaluating whether Defendant is entitled to qualified immunity, the Court must determine “(1) whether the plaintiff has established the violation of a constitutional right, and (2) whether that right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 9:19 pm
Take a look at Volume 1, Edition 1 (see the Comments below for Karl's warning). [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Denbo 15-319Issue: (1) Whether a claims administrator with no obligation to pay benefits under an Employee Retirement Income Security Act plan is a proper defendant in a Section 502(a)(1)(B) action for benefits due under that plan; and (2) whether a Section 502(a)(3) claim can be dismissed on the pleadings because a proper Section 502(a)(1)(B) claim would fully remedy the plaintiff's injury. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Russ Bensing
  Self-defense requires a showing that (1) the defendant wasn’t at fault in creating the situation giving rise to the affray, (2) he had a legitimate belief he was in danger of death or great bodily harm, and (3) he didn’t violate any duty of retreat. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:47 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant was convicted of all charges at trial and sentenced to a minimum term of 336 months. (1) The defendant failed to preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conspiracy charge. [read post]