Search for: "VIKRAM AMAR" Results 621 - 640 of 651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In a recent Verdict column, my colleague Vikram Amar discussed the winner-take-all method of determining who is sent to vote for president in the Electoral College. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
  As explained by Professor Vikram Amar in two prior Verdict columns (here and here), the appeals court relied on two Supreme Court precedents—the 1969 case of Hunter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” Hasen argued that as we look with fear toward 2024’s election aftermath, we should [f]orget bonkers accusations about Italy using lasers to manipulate American vote totals and expect white-shoe lawyers with Federalist Society bona fides to argue next time about application of the “independent state legislature” doctrine in an attempt to turn any Republican presidential defeat into victory.My Verdict colleague Vikram Amar is arguably the leading expert on… [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In the space below I offer some initial reactions to a bill that cleared the California Senate Judiciary Committee last month and that has been generating controversy, especially within parts of the South Asian community, in the Golden State. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  I cannot improve on Professor Vikram Amar's Verdict column explaining the meaning of direct and indirect taxes, but the point of the 16th Amendment was to say that even though the Court was wrong, the income tax is no longer subject to its misguided holding: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In my columns, I cited with approval a two-part Verdict series by Illinois Law's Dean Vikram Amar and his colleague Professor Jason Mazzone. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Dean Vikram Amar observed here on Verdict in the summer of 2019 on the twenty-fifth anniversary of Breyer’s appointment, he was too far back in line for the best assignments. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Republican obstructionism is once again controlling Washington. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Accordingly, we can separate the plausible scenarios from the hot air.The Challenge Is PreposterousRegular Verdict readers will have learned from an outstanding four-part series by Vikram Amar, Evan Caminker, and Jason Mazzone that the challenge to the ACA the Court hears today rests on a truly preposterous chain of reasoning.In 2010, Congress enacted the ACA, a complex law with some interrelated and many unrelated parts. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Illinois Law Dean Vikram Amar noted in his Verdict column last week, part of that inquiry seems perverse, or at least ironic: The conservative justices who want to limit race-based affirmative action suggested during the oral argument that because the current version of the TPP only boosts Latino and African American enrollment a little, it may be unnecessary and thus unconstitutional; yet, one would have thought that minimizing the use of race is precisely what it means to… [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a companion column, Dean Vikram Amar will explore the intriguing possibility that Justice Kagan’s opinion is in some sense really about abortion. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Professor Vikram Amar argued in an April column that developments since the Jones case could buttress Trump’s argument that a president deserves temporary immunity. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail has already been addressed by our scholarship. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
The Foreign Emoluments Clause provides that “no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notwithstanding some recent competition, the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) remains the most widely used and accepted standardized test considered by American law schools to admit new students to law school. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Say what you will about Donald Trump, he is a prodigious generator of constitutional law. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:20 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Most pertinently, it seems clear that the Supreme Court will soon rule in favor of the so-called Independent State Legislature theory (which my Verdict colleague Vikram Amar thoroughly debunked again two days ago), allowing gerrymandered Republican state legislatures in swing states to override the will of their voters in 2024 and award electors to Donald Trump (or whoever is the Republican presidential nominee).More broadly, the moving parts in our constitutional rules for… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Vikram Amar – It’s hard for me to imagine that the Court is anxious to take up the merits of this battle between Congress and the President over the dicey question of whether Jerusalem should be considered by the United States to be part of Israel. [read post]