Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 621 - 640 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am by Peter Mahler
As a matter of fact, providing employment for himself may have been the principal reason why he participated in organizing the corporation. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:58 pm
Moreover, "[w]hen the parties raise an actual dispute regarding the proper scope of these claims, the court, not the jury, must resolve that dispute. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Bruno (read here) granted Becker’s motion and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Bruno (read here) granted Becker’s motion and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
Thus, once granted, access privileges can also be amended over time. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
To paraphrase what the late great Professor David Gregory said: "[W]hat the state courts say is not the law. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:17 am by Shawn Gorman (Gamertag: pbot1)
” In fact, the Federal Circuit indicated that “[t]his case appears to repeat the erroneous methodology that led this court to grant mandamus in TS Tech. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
”The simple fact of the matter is that, while a drug (or device) company supposedly might be able to fool some of the medical community some of the time, it’s simply not possible to fool all of the medical community all of the time. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Local variation matters even as broader patterns appear. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Collidoue Invest Fr., No. 09-0329-CV-W-GAF, 2009 WL 1766716, at *1 (W.D. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:10 pm by Bexis
Next, the court declared that it wasn’t bound (nor very impressed) by all the federal, Pennsylvania trial court, and out-of-state precedent that Dow had amassed in support of its position. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(IP Watch)   Canada EU demands for trade deal would reshape Canadian IP law (Michael Geist) Federal Court considers colour marks: Peak Innovations Inc v Simpson Strong Tie Company (Canadian Trademark Blog)   China China’s standards and patent innovation proposals: problems for IPR and global trade? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Remember, this is pediatric surgery, and very few companies sell either drugs or devices specifically intended and approved for use in children. [read post]