Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of"
Results 621 - 640
of 942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2013, 9:17 am
So basically, this is like the judicially made-up rule that professors’ scholarly writings aren’t works for hire, no matter the tension with the text of the Copyright Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 2:03 pm
Today, Chief Judge Lamberth mostly sides with Hatim and company. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
By Diane Kindermann, William W. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
Of course, Outten & Golden isn’t the only firm bringing these claims. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:57 am
After a series of FRAND-friendly rulings in different jurisdictions denying injunctive relief over standard-essential patents (SEPs), it came as a surprise that the ITC granted Samsung's request for a ban. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Or Joyce Carol Oates’ next roman a clef about a college football player who sues a video game company. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
[Since] the only expert who offered an opinion . . . about ghostwriting and company-funded publications was Parisian, this prong of [defendant’s] omnibus motion is granted. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/yRBntV4LPH -> What is – and isn’t – Fair Dealing? [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
Monsanto Company, 569 U. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
A study that examined the activity of patent assertion entities in the German patent market also confirmed these data: T. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:40 am
“[W]e do not analyze satire or parody differently from any other transformative use. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:10 am
[Company name]. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
SCt granted cert and FDA filed amicus. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:17 am
While plaintiffs sought to exclude the expert report, that didn’t matter because they didn’t meet their own evidentiary burden. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
Bone: reason that unfair competition became coextensive w/TM was that there was no longer normative justification for excluding subject matter from TM. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 3:33 pm
The Director also told her that the position would be filled as a civilian contractor through an outside company. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
There’s no hard threshold for misleadingness, and while 9.2% isn’t overwhelming, the court couldn’t conclude it was insubstantial as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 12:38 am
Rather the court must interpret the disputed language in context, w with regard to its intended function in the policy. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
As from 10 January 2015, the recast will replace Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:47 pm
The W&HD says the company failed to pay workers for overtime and failed to pay prevailing wage rates and fringe benefits. [read post]
