Search for: "Warne v. Warne" Results 621 - 640 of 19,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
On appeal, York Capital argued that the Second Circuit’s test set out in Coppola v Bear Stearns & Co for determining whether a creditor is an employer within the meaning of the WARN Act should be applied. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
In the wake of Riegel, if you are a consumer advocate or a products liability lawyer you certainly wait with bated breath for the outcome in Wyeth v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:56 pm
Powell was whether the warnings the defendant received before interrogation adequately conveyed his right to the presence of an attorney during questioning, which is a right that was established in Miranda v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 12:56 pm
   These stories always begin with horrific, heart-wrenching facts but generally wend their way to satisfying endings.Today’s case, Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:22 am by Brian Shiffrin
Smith both Miranda warnings and chemical test warnings as contemplated in Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194(2)(f).The chemical test warnings informed defendant: "You are under arrest for driving while intoxicated. [read post]
21 May 2007, 10:01 pm
The Vermont Supreme Court ruled in Levine v. [read post]