Search for: "Wells v. Heard*" Results 621 - 640 of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 2:13 pm
As well as a reminder that there may well be consequences that you might want to consider before hitting the "Send" button. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
  The case was heard before Judges Wells, Emas, and Logue, with Logue writing the opinion, that can be found here. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
This is an otherwise boring tax case, as well as one that reaches what seems to me a straightforward resolution of the thing. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:13 am
It looks like the statute might well say that.But, if so, wow. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:41 pm
Over the past 24 hours there have been well over 100 blog posts about the recent ruling in the Lenz v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:06 pm
 Though she can't communicate very well, she spins some sort of tale about having woken up with previous evening with her catheter removed and hearing male voices near her bed, seeing her curtains move, and having someone at the nursing home say "This is why I love my job." [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:42 am
(Without much benefit, either; the only thing they heard as far as I can tell were the opening statements, which might well have to be redone anyway depending on what the trial court holds on remand.)Let's just play it safe and restart the whole thing over again, okay? [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
His pawnshop dealt in firearms as well, which is how he came into possession of the firearms he was convicted of possessing. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
In light of the statute‘s text, as well as its purpose of prohibiting prosecutorial forum shopping, the trial court‘s discretion should be exercised in accordance with the following understanding: A judge may be found unavailable for purposes of section 1538.5(p) only if the trial court, acting in good faith and taking reasonable steps, cannot arrange for that judge to hear the motion. [read post]
11 May 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
Initial Hearing Procedure Master Robertson acting as application judge (Avli BRC Developments Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by The Settlement Channel
The case of Yanisse Adrian v Mesirow Structured Settlements, LLC was heard by US District Court Judge Francisco Besosa and he granted the defendants summary judgement motion and dismissed the case. [read post]