Search for: "Wells v. Katz"
Results 621 - 640
of 806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:10 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:06 pm
The case was very well argued by the defendant-appellant’s lawyer, David Katz, who raised all the relevant issues. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 10:15 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
20 May 2017, 8:56 pm
— Hammond v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 9:00 pm
Jon Katz. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 6:31 am
"Unfortunately, the justices were not focused on what should have been the core concerns, which were well addresses in plaintiff’s and amici’s brief," said attorney Danny Katz of Silver Spring, Maryland, who attended the argument. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
The "law and society" scholars of the 1960s, did have Phd's (in many cases) and solid social science tool kits, but they were largely based outside of law schools and only penetrated in a few distinct schools (Wisconsin, Berkeley, Buffalo, Denver, Miami, perhaps a few others).Empirical LawyeringAs I argued in a UC Davis Law Review article on the 40th anniversary of Katz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 11:13 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in Paracha v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 12:57 pm
More on the book’s format below…There is a fairly detailed and interesting discussion of the recent CBC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm
I observed the same in Oracle v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
Ariel Katz and others. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
” Katz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:14 pm
Co., 60 F.3d 1126, 1131 (4th Cir.1995) (quoting Katz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 9:42 am
" Id. at 525 (quoting Katz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
The U.S. federal court system has established and documented well-detailed instructions on how aggregate, or classwide, damages are determined. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Under Katz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Moreover, when the Board is indecisive even about deciding such a basic issues as whether a person engaged in case management should be on the presiding panel (which should be avoided at all costs, as is the case in the Federal Court as every experienced Federal Court lawyer knows well), it’s hard to imagine how the Board would be thinking about bringing in the concept of amicus curiae or “assessors” – which would be admittedly unusual but arguably within the realm… [read post]
