Search for: "Wells v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 28,994
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
Well, the Supreme Court of the United States granted cert in the case in October. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
  An attorney who has practiced 3 decades before several Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal, including the United States Supreme Court, summed up the experience of working appeals with the VA Office of General Counsel: “They are petty and arrogant and vindictive – young lawyers whose bosses have never taught them how to carry themselves like professionals. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:01 pm by Christopher Mathews
  CDR Cave will be a guest; Colonel Sullivan plans to participate as well, although he may be a little late calling in. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm by NCC Staff
Richardson, a case that furthered the cause of gender equality within the U.S. military and, indeed, the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:09 am by Zoe Bedell
United States, vacating defendant Ali Hamza Suliman al Bahlul’s conviction for inchoate conspiracy. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump concedes, as he must (Br. at 24-25), that the President is an “officer” for purposes of the Constitution.[1]  After all, the Constitution refers to the President’s “office” or to the “Office of the President” almost two dozen times.[2]  He insists, however, that the qualifying phrase “of the United States” in Section 3 serves to exclude the President, as well as the Vice-President,… [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:31 pm by Aimee Hess
Continue reading → The post Important Texas Oil & Gas Case – Roland Oil Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 11:35 am
  They get caught and flee to the United States using fake immigration documents, and are prosecuted in federal court. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Charon QC
The United States appears to have a few ‘issues’ with judicial systems that do not fall within their control. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am by Paul M. Rashkind
Writing for the majority, Justice Ginsburg relied on "that unwritten but long-standing rule" that "an appellate court may not alter a judgment to benefit a nonappealing party," as well as the express limitations on government appeals in 18 U.S.C. [read post]