Search for: "Wells v. United States of America" Results 621 - 640 of 3,577
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:09 am by Zachary Price
ShareA review of Ian Millhiser, The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America (Columbia Global Reports 2021) In The Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America, Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser offers an engaging, accessible and well-informed statement of progressive anxieties about what the Supreme Court’s newly strengthened conservative majority may do. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Jason Poblete
How the United States and Cuba find closure to the multi-billion dollar property question will set the tone for such matters in the future. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm by Amy Howe
The government’s recommendation in Bank of America v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:52 am by Tom Donnelly
Let’s begin with Bingham’s text: No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 4:47 am
Answer to today's ICJ inquiry puzzler above:The only nation-state that has declined to appear since 1981 in a case before the International Court of Justice is the United States of America. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 7:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Indigenous health policy in the United States and Latin America: The Marshall trilogy and the international human rights approach. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
The Constitution of the United States is rarely changed, but that has not stopped speculation about the next amendment to our nation’s founding document. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 4:00 am by Andrew Flavelle Martin
Gibbon is important for at least two reasons.[7] First, it appears to be the first decision applying Gladue principles in judicial discipline – a point of law that the Divisional Court upheld on judicial review virtually without comment.[8] Insofar as Gibbon explicitly followed a 2013 decision applying Gladue principles in lawyer discipline, it may not seem particularly surprising.[9] However, this application and its ready acceptance by the Divisional Court panel is particularly notable in… [read post]