Search for: "Williams v. Force Protection" Results 621 - 640 of 1,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Turner v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, William Yeatman remarks that in Kisor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 1:19 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
William Ford shared the ruling issued by a federal judge in Seattle upholding the court’s primary injunction on the president’s ban on military service by openly transgender individuals and declaring these individuals a protected class. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The European Data Protection Board have created a dedicated task force on ChatGPT. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 7:06 am by Pete Strom
Highlights of the Richland County mask mandate: The use of a face covering is required within the City of Columbia, including the University of South Carolina and the Williams-Brice Stadium during South Carolina football games. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Perhaps it’s fitting to close with William Pitt’s remarks during a debate in Parliament in 1763: The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 4 July 2023, Heather Williams J heard preliminary arguments and a strike out application in Davidoff v Hargrave. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eleanor Runde
William Dodge argues, citing the Torture Victim Protection Act, that jus cogens violations—acts that contravene the fundamental norms of international law—“cannot be considered official acts for the purposes of conduct-based immunity. [read post]