Search for: "Witte v. WITTE"
Results 621 - 640
of 800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
Benjamin Wittes believes that “Latif offers the detainee bar its best opportunity yet to get the D.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 2:41 pm
Ben Wittes asked that I share some thoughts on the legacy of my former boss in national-security law. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Circuit en banc decision, Al Bahlul v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:10 pm
Barco v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
The Court granted oral argument on whether to grant leave in Dadd v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 10:00 pm
Denezpi v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
United States and Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am
Tim Edgar provided his final thoughts on reforming surveillance and European privacy rules in light of the European Court of Justice’s ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
(Full disclosure: Protect Democracy represents Benjamin Wittes, Scott R. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
As Benjamin Wittes detailed, on March 8, House Judiciary Chair Peter Rodino formally requested the materials submitted to Sirica, noting that the committee had unanimously authorized him to do so. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Finally, Rapelje v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 10:30 pm
This decision was instrumental in the English Court of Appeal’s 2018 ruling in Uber bv v Aslam. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:13 am
K 675 W57 2012 From sacrament to contract : marriage, religion, and law in the Western tradition John Witte, Jr. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:21 am
Kagan was not yet in office as Solicitor General in February 2009 when the Obama Administration asked the Supreme Court to give it more time to pursue an appeal of a major Ninth Circuit Court ruling on the policy — the Circuit Court’s ruling in Witt v. [read post]
