Search for: "BANKS V. STATE" Results 6381 - 6400 of 15,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2007, 7:42 pm
Tracey Scott Esteppe pled guilty to a charge of armed bank robbery in May of 2005. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
Existing SEC rules prohibit investment banks that underwrite a company’s IPO from publishing research on companies that would be classified as emerging growth companies under the legislation. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:25 pm
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. and Jones v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:11 am by New York Civil Law
The decision is helpful because the Court analyzes important General Business Law sec. 349 precedent -- e.g., Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v Marine Midland Bank, Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 1:22 pm by New York Civil Law
The decision is helpful because the Court analyzes important General Business Law sec. 349 precedent -- e.g., Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v Marine Midland Bank, Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 08/06/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
State Street Bank implicitly rejected the structural barriers to bringing class actions over fiduciary breaches that had been created by the developing case law in other circuits and which were discussed in my recent article, Structural Impediments to Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:39 am by Neil Burns
  First, the attorney incorrectly cited the law, stating that a creditor bank had violated the “automatic stay” entitled by the debtor. [read post]