Search for: "D. S." Results 6381 - 6400 of 236,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
Still, the Dirks case has resulted in decades of confusion over what is – and what is not – insider trading, and I believe that we’d have all been better off if the SEC had not engaged in overzealousness where Dirks was concerned – particularly given the agency’s non-response to the allegations he’d brought to its attention. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 3:15 am by John Jenkins
The issue includes the following articles: – SEC Amends Section 13(d) and Section 13(g) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules – Related Person Transactions: Item 404’s Requirements Please email sales@ccrcorp.com to subscribe to this essential resource if you are not already receiving the important updates we provide in The Corporate Counsel newsletter. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 7:45 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Put simply, these are the stories so well executed by folks at other outlets that we wish we’d published them [link is to read free]. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” See also Mike Elgan, Mikes List: [subscription req’d] Why the New York Times’ lawsuit against OpenAI is just a negotiating tactic. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 2:02 pm by The White Law Group
He allegedly misled investors about the profits they’d make through two entities, Phoenix and Edger Management. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:53 pm by Matt Kurnick
  While Section 45X(d)(2) of the Code established that eligible components must be produced in the United States or a possession of the United States to be eligible for 45X Credits, the Proposed Regulations clarify that this requirement does not apply to constituent elements, materials and subcomponents used in the production of eligible components. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:44 pm by Steve Gottlieb
That’s a real Christmas story, a story of the great principles that Christ and the leaders of the world’s major faiths tried to teach us. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Derek T. Muller
And this literature, the assumption notes, is “pointing to the activity of using [a] doctrine and skills [b] in context [c] in combination with the exercise of [d] critical perspectives, values, and habits as necessary for professional formation. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Derek T. Muller
And this literature, the assumption notes, is “pointing to the activity of using [a] doctrine and skills [b] in context [c] in combination with the exercise of [d] critical perspectives, values, and habits as necessary for professional formation. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 10:01 am by DONALD SCARINCI
According to Justice Thomas, Laufer’s “claim d[id] not assert a violation of a right under the ADA, much less a violation of her rights. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:09 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
En voyant dans le défi posé par les changements climatiques un laboratoire expérimental, les contributions réunies dans ce volume s’attachent à mesurer la capacité du droit international dans un large éventail de domaines (du droit de la paix et de la sécurité internationales, au droit des investissements ou du commerce, aux droits de l’homme et à bien d’autres encore) à… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:01 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
At the same time, copyright protection was granted to a phrase by a late Bavarian comedian, Karl Valentin: ‘I wanted to like it, but I did not dare to’ (‘Mögen hätte ich schon wollen, aber dürfen habe ich mich nicht getraut’, 7 O 8226/11). [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by John Floyd
  “Thomas also received dozens of expensive gifts throughout the 2000s, sometimes coming from people he’d met only shortly before. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing 12 NYCRR 300.13 [a] [4]; [b] [2] [iv] [d]; [b] [4] [i], the Appellate Division opined the Board "did not abuse its discretion in denying the [Employer's] application for review" in view of the Employer's failure to serve or provide proof of service upon Claimant's current counsel [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing 12 NYCRR 300.13 [a] [4]; [b] [2] [iv] [d]; [b] [4] [i], the Appellate Division opined the Board "did not abuse its discretion in denying the [Employer's] application for review" in view of the Employer's failure to serve or provide proof of service upon Claimant's current counsel [read post]