Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 6381 - 6400 of 112,786
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2023, 4:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Overall, the InfoSoc Directive does not differentiate between the taking of a work as a whole or in part for the sake of applying Article 2, so the concept of reproduction ‘in part’ should not be intended in a quantitative sense. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:57 am by Matt Tait
It is possible to have a society that does not have fair trials: Ancient societies, and modern dictatorships all exist without them. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am by INFORRM
Qualified immunity means that public officials are excused from civil liability so long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by SHG
But does it collide “”with the rights of others to be secure and be let alone”? [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am by Kalvis Golde
United States Bureau of Reclamation 22-1116Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:08 pm
Conversely, retrial is permissible when a trial terminates on a basis unrelated to factual guilt or innocence of the offense of which the defendant is accused, e.g., juror deadlock. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
”[12] The Supreme Court noted that Rogers was “a cabined doctrine” which “has applied only to cases involving ‘non-trademark uses’ – or otherwise said, cases in which ‘the defendant has used the mark’ at issue in a ‘non-source-identifying way. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
”[12] The Supreme Court noted that Rogers was “a cabined doctrine” which “has applied only to cases involving ‘non-trademark uses’ – or otherwise said, cases in which ‘the defendant has used the mark’ at issue in a ‘non-source-identifying way. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
”[12] The Supreme Court noted that Rogers was “a cabined doctrine” which “has applied only to cases involving ‘non-trademark uses’ – or otherwise said, cases in which ‘the defendant has used the mark’ at issue in a ‘non-source-identifying way. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 9:13 am
Classification and National Defense InformationJust because something is classified... does not mean it is National Defense Information within the meaning of the Espionage Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Hyemin Han
Those charges are a culmination of years of serial investigations of Trump’s activities and transformed a former president into a defendant in federal court for the first time. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:51 am by Seán Binder
 Trump might have to defend himself in three trials early next year as he seeks the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. [read post]