Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY" Results 6381 - 6400 of 36,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Owners Corp., 87 N.Y.2d. 938 (1996)(“the ‘cleaning’ encompassed under the statute does not include the routine, household window washing… [but does include] the cleaning of all the windows of a large, nonresidential structure such as a school") Khela v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:36 pm
In Joined Cases T-125/03 and T-253/03 Akzo Nobel Chemicals and Akcros Chemicals v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:03 am by Daniel Schwartz
We have another appellate court case that emphasizes that point quiet well in Stratford v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 4:15 pm by Milord A. Keshishian
Bulat, 510 F.3d 1079, 85 U.S.P.Q.2d 1372 (9th Cir. 2007) (“Section 1117(c) makes no provision for attorney's fees; nor does § 1117(b) authorize such fees for a plaintiff seeking statutory damages under § 1117(c). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:16 pm
Further, the use of this site, and the sending or receipt of this information, does not create an attorney-client relationship between us. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:02 pm
There was one opinion that I came across that especially sparked my interest - Serricchio v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:11 pm by CJLF Staff
The following is a guest post by Connecticut Senior Assistant State's Attorney Harry Weller, commenting on Justice Breyer's dissenting opinion in Glossip v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:42 am by rrobson
Judge Sam Sparks did not have very kind words for the attorneys on either side of the challenge to the 2011 abortion Act in his opinion in Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 12:57 pm by Mike Scarcella
An attorney for Sprint, Steven Sunshine, an antitrust practice leader with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, said Sprint does have a private right to sue. [read post]