Search for: "EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES" Results 6381 - 6400 of 7,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 2:04 pm
In other words, the same (ambiguous) text in the Constitution and Declaration of Independence can support a host of different values -- liberal or conservative.This observation applies with equal force to the portion of the document that advocates limited government. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:00 am by Michael Ginsborg
How about whether or not a person has the right to advocate a certain position on an issue, or whether or not they have a right to remain silent if arrested? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:49 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Eichelberger strikes me as a very able advocate for "traditional marriage," capitalizing on divided public opinion. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:14 am
  How could UVA produce two icons of liberal political thought, leaders of the fight for racial equality and economic justice? [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:19 pm
This is a big win for trial lawyers and patients' rights advocates, and a black eye for tort-reformers. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 11:30 am by John Watkins
Equally unfortunately, our Utopian carrier, at least to my knowledge, does not exist. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 7:41 am by Chris Kramer
Additional Resources Choosing the Mortgage that’s Right for You (PDF) [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
With an attorney on your side, your ex will be less likely to try and undermine your property rights, and, should your ex try to hide or keep assets from you, an attorney can make this fact known to the judge and advocate your rights to those assets. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 8:00 pm by Berin Szoka
So be equally prepared for everyone around you to know who you are and where you are when you post to Buzz from your phone. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:05 pm by Dorothy M. Ehrlich, ACLU
Civil rights advocate and litigator, Michelle Alexander will discuss her new book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness at a forum cosponsored by the national ACLU (along with the Metropolitan Black Bar Association, and The New Press) on Thursday, February 18, 2010, at 6 p.m. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:05 pm by Dorothy M. Ehrlich, ACLU
Civil rights advocate and litigator, Michelle Alexander will discuss her new book, The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness at a forum cosponsored by the national ACLU (along with the Metropolitan Black Bar Association, and The New Press) on Thursday, February 18, 2010, at 6 p.m. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:04 am by Michael Geist
Although quite common, contracting out of class action rights has long been a source of frustration for consumers and consumer advocates. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 5:41 am by Lawrence Solum
Introduction The dominant approaches to normative legal theory in the American legal academy converge on fairly robust role for the state and government subject to the constraints imposed by an equally robust set of individual rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm by Michael Ginsborg
" KOB.com has a video clip of the Governor's comment.DOMAMary Banauto is the Civil Rights Project Director at Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
  Professor Mack writes extensively on the history and politics of civil rights law; his book Representing the Race: Creating the Civil Rights Lawyer, 1920-1955 will be published by Harvard University Press this year. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:30 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Scholars have often argued, however, that wartime has been the context for the expansion of equality rights. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm by Michael Ginsborg
" Maggie Gallagher, president of the National Organization for Marriage, contends that, in any case, marriage-equality advocates "are not doing this for the kids. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:09 pm by Steven M. Gursten
Equally important is the significance this case has for all attorneys who truly care about justice in the state of Michigan. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:05 pm by Michael Ginsborg
But why would a marriage-equality proponent accept Miller's underlying premise - that voters should decide whether members of an unpopular minority have a right to marry? [read post]