Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 6381 - 6400 of 12,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  In one of the first appellate opinions involving issues surrounding the statutory cause of action for barratry, the Dallas Court of Appeals recently reversed a final summary judgment in favor of a lawfirm, its attorneys, and an "investigator" who had procured a high-stakes and high-dollar pipeline explosion tort case for the firm. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
  In one of the first appellate opinions involving issues surrounding the statutory cause of action for barratry, the Dallas Court of Appeals recently reversed a final summary judgment in favor of a lawfirm, its attorneys, and an "investigator" who had procured a high-stakes and high-dollar pipeline explosion tort case for the firm. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:53 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
The plaintiff is seeking damages from Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endovision, Inc., and Karl Storz GMBH & Co. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:53 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
The plaintiff is seeking damages from Karl Storz Endoscopy-America, Inc., Karl Storz Endovision, Inc., and Karl Storz GMBH & Co. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an important decision concerning D&O insurance coverage in connection with failed bank claims, the Tenth Circuit, applying Kansas law, held that a D&O policy’s insured vs. insured exclusion unambiguously precluded coverage for claims brought by the FDIC as receiver of a failed bank against the bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The art and the benefit of the exit interview is lost on so many companies today–too often because departing employees are dismissed as resentful and unreliable. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am by Terry Hart
 As the First Circuit has explained: [T]he adjudicative framework surro [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:12 pm by Joy Waltemath
First the employer argued that the NRLB applied a “new standard” when it applied the “compelling circumstances” test. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:24 am by Emma Quinn-Judge
  First, it may consider any qualified cadets (up to thirty-five or one-third of a Boston police academy class). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:49 am by Brian Hall
Unpaid internships have been shown to bestow a mutual benefit upon the intern and the employer. [read post]