Search for: "Fail v. State"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 66,289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:08 am
It also rejects the state's argument that the verdict form demonstrated jury confusion.The case is Saber v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm
Similarly, the Cameron v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
Autumn Fox and Doug Thompson won today in State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
In 2013, he obtained a restraining order against some of the authors in New York state court. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:28 pm
they fail badly. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:48 am
See State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:15 am
In the recent case of Carter v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:58 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:16 pm
Donnelley Publishing & Advertising, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 12:00 am
In the case of Doe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 8:06 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:41 am
On May 20, 2013, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Medtronic v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175 the Court of Appeals held that "mandamus* is available 'only to enforce a clear legal right where the public official has failed to perform a duty enjoined by law'" In this action brought by Plaintiff pursuant to CPLR §7803[1] seeking certain agency records under color of New York State's Freedom of Information Law, the Appellate Division held that the agency, in response to… [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:00 am
Liberties Union v State of New York, 4 NY3d 175 the Court of Appeals held that "mandamus* is available 'only to enforce a clear legal right where the public official has failed to perform a duty enjoined by law'" In this action brought by Plaintiff pursuant to CPLR §7803[1] seeking certain agency records under color of New York State's Freedom of Information Law, the Appellate Division held that the agency, in response to… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:03 am
The shopping mall operator plaintiff prevailed on every significant issue, and the case failed to satisfy the Lanham Act’s requirement that a case be “exceptional” before fees could be awarded (Simon Property Group, L.P. v. [read post]
