Search for: "GROUP v. STATE" Results 6381 - 6400 of 37,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2021, 2:14 pm by Amy Howe
With the justices slated to consider in the fall a Mississippi abortion law intended to challenge Roe v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 2:02 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Here, a group of energy companies were sued by the mayor and city council of Baltimore in state court, where they alleged that the defendants had concealed the adverse environmental effects of the fossil fuel products they promoted and sold in Baltimore City. [read post]
27 May 2021, 6:23 am by Michelle David
The Tribunal has determined that the employer in the recent decision in the matter of Oasis Group Holdings (Pty) Limited v Mansoor and Others, is liable for the costs of the fund member in opposing the application on the High Court scale. [read post]
26 May 2021, 12:12 pm by Matthias Weller
The Rechtbank Den Haag, by judgment of 26 March 2021 – Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To survive a motion to dismiss under 3211(a)(7), “a pleading need only state allegations from which damages attributable to the defendant’s conduct may be reasonably inferred” (Lappin v Greenberg, 34 AD3d 277, 279 [1st Dept 2006] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
25 May 2021, 12:12 pm by Giles Peaker
(Watters – R v Wolverhampton MBC, ex p. [read post]
25 May 2021, 6:27 am by CMS
On 11 April 2016, Damon Parker of HSLLP signed a non-disclosure agreement “the NDA” which included a non-compete clause, which stated that HSLLP undertook “not to accept instructions for or to act on behalf of any other group of Claimants in the contemplated Group  Action” without the express permission of YLL (“the Undertaking”). [read post]
25 May 2021, 2:55 am by Colby Pastre
States were never intended to tax international income, and doing so raises serious constitutional issues in many states. [read post]
24 May 2021, 5:00 pm by BKK
It also includes discrimination based on sex stereotyping, actual or perceived sexual orientation or transgender status, and other circumstances where the plaintiff “was perceived as not conforming to traditional male stereotypes” the court stated, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in 2020 in Bostock v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 10:03 am by Lisa Peets, Marty Hansen and Vicky Ling
Broadly speaking, national supervisory authorities designated by individual Member States would oversee and enforce the Regulation, with support from a new European Artificial Intelligence Board. [read post]