Search for: "In Interest of Jones" Results 6381 - 6400 of 7,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937) (federal regulatory power extended to intra state activities that could cumulatively have a substantial effect on commerce);  Heart of Atlanta Motel v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Agencies Announce Plans for More Equity in Federal Programs MSN – Michael Macagnone (Roll Call) | Published: 4/14/2022 Dozens of federal agencies launched plans that focus on minority groups and other underserved communities, meant to open federal programs to more people and reduce racial disparities caused by government decisions. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Mast stipulated that the government has a compelling interest in treating wastewater, but believes the lower court over-read that and didn’t require the government to demonstrate it had a compelling interest in imposing septic systems in particular. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Under the standard set forth by the US Supreme Court in Adarand Constructors Inc v Pena (65 EPD ¶43,366 (1995)), to survive constitutional review, a government entity’s consideration of race has to meet strict scrutiny standards; thus, it must: (1) serve a compelling state interest; and (2) be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:36 am by Helena Haapio
(Hank) Jones and Michael Oswald recognized this need and discussed the technology tools available to help lawyers and others to use flowcharts to clarify contractual information. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Finally, as Lyle reported yesterday, the Court denied review in Jones v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
Several justices have expressed an interest in overruling Employment Division, but the question remains whether this is the case to do it. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm by Elim
& Shaw, Byron 2013 Link Constitutional Law, Third Edition Monahan, Patrick J. 2006 Link Copyright Law Vaver, David 2000 Link Counsel for the Defence: The Bernard Cohn Memorial Lectures in Criminal Law Greenspan, Edward L. 2005 Link Courts, Litigants and the Digital Age : Law, Ethics and Practice Eltis, Karen 2012 Link Criminal Law, Fifth Edition Roach, Kent 2012 Link Criminal Law, Fourth Edition Roach, Kent 2009 Link Criminal Procedure, Second Edition Coughlan, Steve 2012 Link Criminal Procedure… [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by Rick
Jones, 18 Cal.4th at 682, quoting People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:40 am by David Post
  If you’re interested, see chapter 10 (“Governing Cyberspace II: Names”) of my book In Search of Jefferson’s Moose: Notes on the State of Cyberspace for a detailed account. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:23 am by Jonathan Holbrook
The higher court acknowledged Jones but explained that it was an inadequate basis for comparison because the challenged statements in Jones arose during the closing arguments in the sentencing phase of a death penalty case. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:28 am by William Ford
” Bruce Jones will deliver introductory remarks, followed by a keynote address from Amb. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
When an officer pulls over a car, is he seeking to interfere with an individual's "possessory interests" in the vehicle or seeking to control a person's freedom of movement? [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Ex-Congressman Asks 11th Circuit to Toss Six-Figure Campaign Finance Penalty Courthouse News Service – Kayla Gogging | Published: 4/16/2024 Former U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The group says it is not interested in running a presidential campaign. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:36 pm
Jones, who owned a home in (say) Decatur, Iowa, registered with the Democratic Party, and used their home for meetings of the local Democratic campaign committee, the latter would suddenly be empowered to adopt legislation which made the Jones' home -- and their bank accounts, family silver and other heirlooms, and other property of whatever kind, no matter where or how held -- forever subject to a trust in favor of the Party, such that if Mr. and Mrs. [read post]