Search for: "Law v. USA" Results 6381 - 6400 of 6,908
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 8:09 pm
Unraveling the New Due Process Standard Prohibiting the Use of Nonparty Harm to Calculate Punitive Damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
 As it did in Coy, the Court in Eavenson relied on the state law of the jurisdiction, in this case Illinois, to determine whether the amended petition related back to the original petition and was thus not subject to CAFA citing to Schillinger v. 360 Networks USA Knudsen v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:13 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKPersonal PropertyPacts Limited Firm's Liability for Engineer's Loss Of Hard Drive With Student Borrower InformationHummingbird USA Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
See Lawsuits Test Crackdown On Sex Criminals, Stateline.org, April 18, 2008; Sex-Offender Residency Laws Get Second Look, USA Today, Feb. 26, 2007. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:44 am
" On 25 March 2008, in Medellín v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: EU Commission adopts proposal to extend copyright protection to performing artists from 50 to 95 years: (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Patry Copyright Blog), (IPEG), (Techdirt), (Techdirt),  ‘Triway’ USPTO, EPO, JPO patent work-sharing pilot starts 28 July: (IP Updates), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (EPO),… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
  The Cal Supremes have granted review, and here's the statement of issues for decision:(1) What procedural protections are required by Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:59 pm
Bankruptcy Court - Lexington 08a0412n.06 2008/07/09 USA v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 4:45 am
For example, the static IP address 67.200.59.2 can easily be identified as the Young Conaway law firm. [read post]