Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 269,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2021, 6:50 am
Or the student whose parent has survived torture abroad and is now reading Hamdan v Rumsfeld5 at home in the US. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Law Lessons from DEBORAH ANN WEISS V. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:21 pm
The Arbeitskreis junger Völkerrechtswissenschaftler*innen and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationales Recht have issued a call for papers for a conference on "Cynical International Law? [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Johnson v Unisys Ltd (2001): A Compelling Constitutional Vision of Common Law and Statute? [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Jorge Marcos Ramos, University of Liege - School of Law and Daniel Muheme, University of Liege - School of Law analyze The Brussels Court Judgement in Commission v Elevators Manufacturers, or the Story of How the Commission Lost an Action... [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:28 am
Florida same-sex surviving spouses may be added on a death certificate without a court order In 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its pioneering decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:06 am
In Estate of Hurst v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm
Beasley School of Law Speaker: Nina A. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
Case citation: Welch v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (Webster) v Swindon Local Safeguarding Children Board Queen’s Bench Division “It was not necessary for a local safeguarding children board to wait for the outcome of civil proceedings before conducting a substantive and comprehensive serious case review. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:03 am
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council Queen’s Bench Division “Section 3 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:45 am
Circuit refused to grant en banc rehearing of its decision in Al-Bihani v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:50 am
Red River UK Ltd and Another v Sheikh and Another Court of Appeal “Where an appeal was compromised, the parties were under a duty to inform the court before the hearing so that unnecessary costs were not incurred and court time wasted. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:07 am
Regina (QY) (China) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Even if the assumption was made that removing a foreign national who had forfeited the right to remain could amount to an interference with private life within the meaning of article 8.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, her removal was nevertheless [...] [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:01 am
Unite and Others v Nortel Networks UK Ltd (in Administration) Chancery Division “A claim by an employee against an employer in administration did not require a judgment to render it provable for two reasons: the nature of the claim and the nature of the decision on which any award depended. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:42 am
Regina (Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “Age discrimination against immigrant spouses aged under 21 was justified. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 2:13 am
Independent News and Media Ltd and Others v A Family Division "Court of Protection proceedings were within the recognised exceptions to the open justice principle. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:55 am
Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd Court of Appeal "A claimant who brought an action in tort for exposure to asbestos dust which resulted in mesothelioma was required to establish a material increase in the risk of contracting the disease because of the tortious exposure. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
Patel and Another v Keles and Another Court of Appeal "Where a landlord opposed an application for renewal of a business tenancy but it was shown that were he to regain the lease he was highly likely to sell, he did not have the requisite intention to occupy the premises for the purpose of carrying on his [...] [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:49 am
Regina (Boggis and Another) v Natural England Court of Appeal "The notification of a site of special scientific interest by English Nature was not a plan or project requiring an assessment of its conservation implications on any special protection area which it might affect. [read post]
