Search for: "Motion"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 150,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
There are now two motions to dismiss: San Diego County Motion to Dismiss Yavapai-Apache Motion to Dismiss The petition and attachments are here. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:41 am
.): 423 Texas Motion for Contempt 431 Pueblo Response to Motion for Contempt 468 Pueblo Motion for Summary J 469 Texas Opposition to Motion for Summary J 470 Pueblo Reply in Support of Motion for Summary J 471 Pueblo Motion to Exclude 473 Texas Opposition to Motion to Exclude 477 Pueblo Reply in Support of motion to Exclude 483 DCT Order to Show Cause News coverage on the show cause hearing here. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 1:35 pm
An Illinois attorney has filed a motion for disbarment by consent Between at least January 15, 2015 and December 19, 2019 (when his partnership in the firm was terminated as a result of the conduct described in this statement of... [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:31 pm
Judge Nancy Jacobs has filed a motion to recuse a lay member of the hearing panel in her pending judicial misconduct case, noting that the member is the spouse of a district court of appeal judge appointed by Ron Desantis.... [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Memorandum in Support of S.J. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:10 pm
Following arguments, the judge granted the Motion. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:20 am
Sometimes they file suit anyway, and an opponent in the real estate contract dispute makes a motion to the court to order the parties to arbitrate, rather than litigate. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
The motion is to extend the time to answer for all defendants, so that we have unified scheduled for making motions and answering, and to admit Marc Randazza pro hac vice. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
A notable practice point is that the Court noted in its Memorandum Order that it “continues to find its experimental procedure of addressing multiple Section 101 motions from separate cases in one hearing is an efficient use of judicial resources and a beneficial tool for resolving the merits of Section 101 motions. [read post]
Chief Judge Stark Grants Defendants’ Motion to Sever Claims with Respect to Infringement and Damages
28 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
October 20, 2016), the Court granted, in part, the motion of Defendants Telenav Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC (“the Telenav Defendants”) to sever Plaintiff Vehicle IP’s claims against the Telenav Defendants from the claims against Defendants Telecommunications Systems, Inc., Networks in Motion, Inc., and Cellco Partnership (“the TCS Defendants”). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:53 am
Finally, the Court denied defendant’s motion for a new trial in the alternative. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:04 am
The Court’s Decision The Court denied LogistiCare’s motion to dismiss and denied its motion for summary judgment. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
On June 8th, Judge Robinson denied two motions to transfer. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:54 pm
June 8, 2011), Judge Robinson recently denied defendant’s motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of California. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:20 am
June 13, 2008): Thus, as to those motions to suppress that defendant failed to produce evidence and argument to support the motion, this Court recommends denying those motions on that basis alone. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:32 am
Jarvi's motion for suppression. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:02 pm
After the jury verdict, the court grants the motion to suppress on the ground the defendant’s stop was without reasonable suspicion and the search was without cause, and a judgment of acquittal is entered. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm
Judge Sleet recently adopted in part and overruled in part the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation recommending denial of defendant's motion to stay pending reexamination. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:43 pm
The Court also denied Warner Chilcott’s motion in the alternative for a stay of the interference claim. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:05 am
Chasanow) denied each party's separate motion to exclude the other party's expert's testimony. [read post]