Search for: "Nation v. Nation"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 56,689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Smith v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
In Hesseltine v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:54 am
Whitehead v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
In Julin v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am
Commentary on last week’s oral arguments in Hurst v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
ALLEGATIONS OF GENOCIDE UNDER THE CONVENTION ON THEPREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE(UKRAINE v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:07 am
F-Tex SIA v Lietuvos-Anglijos UAB „Jadecloud-Vilma“; (Case C-213/10); [2012] WLR (D) 123 “Where a liquidator assigned a claim to have a transaction set aside derived from the national law applicable to the insolvency proceedings, the claim subsequently made by the assignee against a third party to have the transaction set aside came within the concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ within the meaning of article 1(1) of… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:19 am
Pioneer Hi Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche agricole alimentari e forestali: (Case C-36/11); [2012] WLR (D) 262 “The cultivation of genetically modified organisms such as the MON 810 maize varieties could not be made subject to a national authorisation procedure when the use and marketing of those varieties were authorised pursuant to article 20 of Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:00 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development (Child Poverty Action Group and another intervening) [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] WLR (D); [2008] WLR (D) 356 “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic (known collectively as the ‘A8 states’) to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Regina (SO) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (The Children’s Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 634 1101; [2010] WLR (D) 257 “Local authorities enjoyed, by virtue of s 23C(4)(c) of the Children Act 1989, the power to accommodate a person who had formerly been a child in care and was therefore a former ‘relevant child’ within s 23A of the Act, and a local authority was not entitled, when considering whether the welfare of a former ‘relevant… [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:50 am
EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AF and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 64; [2008] WLR (D) 00; [2008] WLR (D) 325 “The removal of a foreign national from the United Kingdom was unlawful, as incompatible with the United Kingdom’s obligations under art 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, if it would amount to a flagrant breach of her right to respect for her family life so as to… [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:19 pm
12 Aug 2018, 8:20 pm
19 Oct 2011, 7:09 pm
So when we seek to understand the rights of citizens in the nation that was created by that Revolution, one useful guide is looking at the negative example of what the Americans were revolting against. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 2:01 pm
Signed Filed Complaint MN AG v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:30 pm
I'm fairly confident that Judge Kleinfeld gets this one right, and that Jose Valeriano -- a 34-year old Mexican national with three United States citizen children -- isn't entitled to equitable tolling, and hence can and will (and, legally, should) be deported to Mexico. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Alan Rosenberg is no longer president of SAG, nor even a national board member, but his lawsuit against his own union drags on pointlessly. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:46 pm
Here's the opening: In the 2004 Supreme Court decision Hamdi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:51 am
The latest issue of Archiv des Völkerrechts (Vol. 48, no. 4, December 2010) is out. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Such requirements would be wildly popular with most of the American public and reduce the danger of political elites and party bosses dominating a national convention. [read post]
