Search for: "People v. House"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 12,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2020, 2:33 pm
[In Timbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am
In addition, while many of the houses of worship in Roman Catholic Diocese could seat well over 500 people, they were subject to attendance caps of ten or twenty-five persons, while retail businesses were not. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
It describes the procedure as ”constitutionally innovative” and that “it may have no legal validity”: the rules were not simply passed through the two Houses of Parliament by the traditional means, there was an additional debate (with no vote) in the House of Commons (but not the House of Lords) to assert the legal power of the Rules against the claims of international human rights law. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
The oldest case on the Court’s docket is Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am
(Engrossed in House [Passed House] - EH)SECTION 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:22 pm
When it comes to filling vacant House seats, the Constitution is clear: Art. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
A state supreme court justice in Brooklyn ruled on February 13 in Bumpus v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:28 am
Finney v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
If any more people had turned up we would have been stacking up in the car park. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Giving everyone the benefit of the doubt, the entire House GOP caucus did not vote against the stimulus package simply because they are Republicans and the President and House majority are Democrats. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:38 pm
Hager v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:09 am
In People v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:34 am
Here’s some people who should probably read this blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
The tendency of speech to offend people is not treated as a secondary effect, and neither is the tendency of speech to cause harms that flow from such offense — for instance, potential fights, R.A.V. v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:15 am
This would be similar to LaRussa v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
U.S., where the Court ruled that using infrared technology to discern what was happening inside of a house (heat lamps were being used to grow marijuana) amounts to a search.What people might reasonably expect today in terms of their privacy against GPS monitoring by law enforcement might be different from what they would expect 10 years down the road if through social networking, people routinely shared their location with many friends.The federal government installs GPS… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:20 am
Secretary of Stage for the Environment, transport and regions v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:06 am
The Michigan Supreme Court in People v Richardson held that giving a duty to retreat instruction in a self-defense case where the Defendant did not have a duty to retreat wasn’t error. [read post]
