Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 7,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 11:29 am
Second, an invocation of the state secrets privilege in this case seems preponderantly likely, but it will be a weaker claim than the one the government made in the earlier round of litigation. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
It’s Auntie BBC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Clanton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
His presentation, entitled ”Enforcement of trade mark rights cross border: the issue of territoriality”, produced a breathtakingly comprehensive checklist of issues which, for good measure, he entwined within the fictional account of the dispute in Aldebaran AG v Betelgeuse NV. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:00 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:28 am
From the beaches to the theme parks to the swamp tours, people want to come here, and they want to come here year-round. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:58 am
” MLive covered the event and posted a short video of Justice Ginsburg discussing the Court’s 1996 decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
is just one of many people who have tried to secure rights to this game which, having reputedly originated in ancient India, now thrives under numerous names and versions all round the world. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:53 am
The style of the case is, American Alternative Insurance Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 6:53 am
Southern Wine and Spirits of Illinois v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:02 am
I suspect it will also initiate a new round of litigation against Google in an effort to claim some of the advertising revenue Google receives under this program. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
" Furthermore, the "Crunchberries" depicted on the [box] are round, crunchy, brightly-colored cereal balls, and the [box] clearly states both that the Product contains "sweetened corn & oat cereal" and that the cereal is "enlarged to show texture. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:04 am
The FBLA also provides that employees are entitled to this leave due to (i) a miscarriage; (ii) an unsuccessful round of intrauterine insemination or of an assisted reproductive technology procedure (such as Invitro Fertilization); (iii) a failed adoption match or an adoption that is not finalized because it is contested by another party; (iv) a failed surrogacy agreement; (v) a diagnosis that negatively impacts pregnancy or fertility; or (vi) a stillbirth. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
The first time that the State petitioned this Court to review the Seventh Court of Appeals’s unanimous decision affirming the trial court’s order granting Cortez’s motion to suppress, this Court vacated the decision of the court of appeals and remanded the case for reconsideration under Heien v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
From Denton v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
That happened in Amos v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:00 am
” Wells Bennett linked us to an interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:07 pm
In the “good old days” of Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 10:35 pm
TSA Passenger Screening: The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in an order that most of the media missed, last week denied a follow up writ of mandamus to compel the rulemaking the court ordered in July 2011 in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
