Search for: "SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL" Results 6381 - 6400 of 29,241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Tonkovic, J.D.A Second Circuit panel has affirmed by summary order a district court judgment finding an attorney liable for issuing false opinion letters. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:49 am
The 2nd District Court of Appeal, Division 8's decision in Lamar Central confirms that this is a viable route." [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Four) closely examined the FAL and concluded that it is not constitutionally void for vagueness, either on its face or as applied against the defendants. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm by Florian Mueller
A second attempt by Apple to overturn a 5G iPhone and iPad sales ban in Colombia has just failed as a Colombian court denied a petition by Apple, but the iPhone maker hasn't exhausted all procedural options yet.The first failed attempt was an emergency motion that Apple had brought with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:08 am
" The court of appeals vacated the judgment dismissing Penguin's complaint and remanded the case back to the district court for further proceedings. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:40 am by Michael S. Levine
As reported on the Hunton Insurance Recovery blog, in a June 1, 2016 decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reminded retailers and product manufacturers to look to their insurance coverages when defending against consumer class actions. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:45 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Related Cases: Settlement Reached in Broward County Negligent Security Case Supreme Court of Florida Reverses in Pinecrest Personal Injury Case Third District Court of Appeal Reverses in Scuba Diving Wrongful Death Case [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
” The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s dismissals of all Plaintiffs’ claims. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:31 am by Florian Mueller
As I predicted in early January based on the official recording of the appellate hearing, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has thrown out the 2014 district court ruling in Apple's favor (which was already a major disappointment for Apple, as Apple got only about 5% of the roughly $2.5 billion it originally wanted).The Federal Circuit opinion is available here (PDF).Here's my takeaway:It's a humiliation for Apple. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm by Florian Mueller
That's a major reason for which I'm underwhelmed by Qualcomm's citation to a 1983 Second Circuit decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:21 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITGovernment County Did Not Violate Union Members' Rights In Connection With Salary Deferral Under Pact Adams v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:47 pm by req@quintilone.com
  Rather than apply Dukes, the Second Appellate District used United States Supreme Court authority from earlier this year, Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As the district court stated, "Though the Second Circuit has yet to rule on the issue, district courts within the Circuit have concluded that, regardless of whether it is in drive-stun or dart-stun mode, the use of a taser constitutes a "significant degree of force" that is akin to pepper spray. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The plaintiffs appealed the district court’s dismissal of their claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
§1981, the Equal Protection Clause, and the New York City Human Rights Law [“NYCHRL”].In March 2017, the District Court [Schofield, J.] granted summary judgment in favor of NYCHA and the Union, finding that the record contained insufficient evidence of discriminatory animus.The Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, affirmed this judgment on appeal [See Wynn v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
., ___ Cal.App.5th ___ (Mar. 27, 2019), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) considered Civil Code section 1782, which states that a CLRA action for damages cannot be maintained unless (a) the plaintiff has made an appropriate pre-filing demand that the defendant "correct, repair, replace, or otherwise rectify" the violation; and (b) the defendant failed to "give" the consumer "an appropriate correction, repair,… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed February 16, 2023, the Second District Court of Appeal (Division 7) affirmed a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition challenging approval of a single-family home expansion project because the petitioner group failed to exhaust administrative remedies. [read post]