Search for: "SESSIONS v. STATE" Results 6381 - 6400 of 6,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2007, 2:39 am
Speaking of lunch, apparently the Hyatt offered a boxed lunch for you to pick up in between sessions but it was something like $20. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:19 pm
Germain offers his take on the Department of Revenue v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
" It begins: "During the legislative session earlier this year, there was much discussion about the constitutional bans on same sex marriage that have been approved in Ohio and Michigan and how they are being interpreted. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:10 am
Brown said the provision came down to the wire of this year's session of the General Assembly, giving legislative services scant time for research. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
  Our Chief Justice was making (v. earning) $107,600 per annum and will now be paid $128,556. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:41 am
"Our War on Terror that has led to the Deaths of Hundreds of Thousands of People" -- how about that for a plenary session? [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:06 pm
Way cool.And of course September (at least part of it) is still in summer (at least in the northern hemisphere) . . .16th ECSL Summer Course on Space Law and Policy September 3-14, 2007, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.My kind of summer school.SPACE 2007 Sept. 18-20, 2007 Long Beach, California; not just law, but includes policy panels, a session on space law chaired by Mark Simonoff of the State Department and lots more.Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition -- 2007 World… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 3:27 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General to provide the government's views on whether states have any authority to bar cell phone companies from listing taxes and fees as separate items on customers' monthly bills (Sprint Nextel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
Supreme Court disagreed, concluding that Wyner was not a prevailing party because her initial victory was “ephemeral" and the final decision on the merits ultimately went against her.In other words, her claim to fees was totally denuded.For a copy of the United States Supreme Court's decision in this case, please use this link: Sole v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
The trial court's decision dismissing Thompson's complaint for failure to state a claim is, therefore, affirmed.In Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]