Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 12,798
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm
For example, the regulatory reform law essentially reversed the Supreme Court case Watters v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:45 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:30 am
Even as Madison, Hamilton, and Marshall each receive hundreds of mentions, Forten and Murray make a single appearance apiece.This shortcoming is a critique less of Leonard and Cornell than of the current state of the field. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
Deveneau v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 7:00 am
A central issue in Schrems v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
When Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Historically, both proponents and opponents of the enrollment multiplier have sought a level playing field, but the arguments are strikingly adverse. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:47 am
Maryland – Hershey v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:33 am
As I noted in The Third Circuit's 1:1 Punitive Damages Ruling: The Lingering Complications of State Farm v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Here are a few examples: AHRI v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:59 am
--Court: Supreme Court of IndianaOpinion Date: 3/21/12Cite: Loparex, LLC v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:20 pm
This is fantastic news for Tomiko and also for the field of legal history -- and especially for the sub-field of civil rights! [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:54 pm
Quakenbush v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 9:54 am
Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain records related to the agency’s communications with Estelle Rogers, a former ACORN attorney currently serving as Director of Advocacy for the ACORN-connected organization Project Vote, President Obama’s former employer (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
"A discretionary change of venue under CPLR 510 (3) is addressed to the convenience of nonparty witnesses" (State of New York v Quintal, Inc., ___ AD3d ___, ___, 2010 NY Slip Op 09061 [2010] [emphasis added and citations omitted]; see State of New York v Slezak Petr. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
The ultimate result of all this, if the ACA is not repealed, is likely to be to drive the entire medical field into a single-payer government system. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Visciotti and its progeny, by finding a state court’s application of Beck v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:07 pm
Hart v. [read post]
