Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 6381 - 6400 of 41,770
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2021, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Massaro v New York State Thruway Authority, 111 AD3d at 1003, the court said "An unwarranted invasion of personal privacy has been characterized as that which would be offensive and objectionable to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities" Here DCS "particularly and specifically justified its denial" when it stated that the correlation of names and home zip codes invaded employee privacy, and offered to release a summary or de-identified… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Friday 26 February, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R (on the application of Begum) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:17 am by Andrew Delaney
No question many of us would like to be here right nowState v. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the sixth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm by Jordana Sanft (CA)
 The action was commenced in the Federal Court by Statement of Claim dated February 9, 2021 (Tragically Hip v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 5:07 pm by Jordana Sanft (CA)
 The action was commenced in the Federal Court by Statement of Claim dated February 9, 2021 (Tragically Hip v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Marks are getting longer over time b/c more is taken. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am by admin
Initially, Shubin testified that he was a B-reader, but after the defense verified his absence from the NIOSH list of certified B-readers, he “modified” his next trial’s testimony to state that he had started, but had not finished, the examination because of an eye problem. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
The Board had denied Applicant ASW's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, but on reconsideration granted the motion in part. [read post]