Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 6381 - 6400 of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
District Court for the Central District of California, who ruled that Eastman had “more likely than not” conspired illegally with Trump to obstruct Congress. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:48 pm by Rekha Arulanantham, ACLU
Constitution On Monday, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in Awad v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 1:59 pm by James Hamilton
That a company has an independent legal obligation of disclosure to its auditors is of no consequence, reasoned the brief, as the district court below recognized when it correctly held that Textron had not waived work product protection.Moreover, the fact that the auditor’s own reserve calculations may be discoverable under the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Supreme Court's affirmation of the ancient common law right of trial by jury in SEC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, in Hausman v Green, No. 3:18-CV-03013 [July 20, 2018]. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Lueck, 471 U.S. 202, 212-13 & n.6 (1985) (multi-factor judicial test).Malone v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina observed, "[i]t would be fundamentally unfair for [a] plaintiff to be able to 'clear his name' and wield a potential judgement against [his accuser] to his advantage but hide under a shield of anonymity if unsuccessful. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by David Post
Smith "filed a lawsuit in federal district court . . . seeking an injunction to prevent the State from forcing her to create wedding websites celebrating marriages that defy (sic) her beliefs. [read post]