Search for: "State v. Frame" Results 6381 - 6400 of 6,747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Essentially, software programmers put up programming code that anyone can download, modify, use and distribute for free, as long as the "borrowed" or "open source" code is clearly indicated and enabled for the distributee to copy, download and use.On August 13, 2008, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided Jacobsen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 3:16 pm
Part V concludes with reflections on the exemplary significance of the natural born citizen clause for constitutional theory.I highly recommend Sach's paper--which is very fine indeed. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:05 am
AUTO - UM - TIMELY APPLICATION TO STAY OF ARBITRATION - CHOICE OF LAW - FRAMED ISSUE HEARINGMatter of Government Employees Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:23 pm
Which is a relevant question, since that's what defendants are now doing (and what the United States files suit to enjoin).Judge McKeown frames the question as follows: "In this appeal, we are asked to determine the unusual question whether dogs are 'livestock.'" And while the district court said that they weren't, and hence granted summary judgment to the United States, Judge McKeown disagrees. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:59 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library.] [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 9:48 am
The face-pieces of divers goggles comprise a seat for the diver's nose, which, in the case of goggles of the double-lens type, is situated between two rigid frames for fixing the lenses of the goggles, while in the case of single-lens goggles, it is situated between the central uprights-shaped substantially in the form of an inverted V-of the single frame which supports the lens. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm
This WSJ article covers the upcoming Supreme Court preemption case Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:49 am
Here is the abstract:The egalitarian voice of the United States Supreme Court resonates forty years after it abolished anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
 Finally, in an effort to strengthen states’ abilities to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing of plans, effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2009, MIPPA requires plans to: use only agents and brokers licensed under state law; abide by state appointment laws; report any agent terminations to the state; and comply with state requests for information regarding the performance of agents, brokers, and… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]