Search for: "State v. L. A. T."
Results 6381 - 6400
of 9,948
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 2:09 pm
Strudley v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am
One trenchant example is Ricci v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/JQaISt (Gardere) Twitter Seeks To Quash Order Requiring Production of Account Holder’s User Information, Tweets – bit.ly/IMCMqV (K&L Gates) Was Samsung Deal a Watershed for Machine Translation in FTC Second Requests? [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 4:05 pm
Por cierto, me agrada especialmente el juez Alex Kozinsky antes citado, presidente de la Corte Suprema de California, ya que es el autor de la sentencia mas famosa de EEUU , dictada en el año 1990 por su sentido del humor al introducir en su célebre sentencia (United States v.Syufy Enterprises, 1990) la cita de 200 títulos de películas entre su argumentación. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:36 am
’” State v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:56 pm
“[L]egal norms [are] forced to yield to political opportunism. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
In reporting on Omega S.A. v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 3:57 pm
When we last checked in on the fate of the new US law applying countervailing duties to imports from "non-market economies" like China and Vietnam, the plaintiffs in the court case that started the whole legislative scramble (GPX Int'l Tire Corp v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:20 am
Last Thursday, after seven years of coursing through various boards of appeals and courts in Europe, the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) held in their robust judgment in Rubinstein and L'Oreal v OHIM (Case C-100/11) that the General Court did not err in law in concluding that L'Oreal's mark for BOTOCYL and Helena Rubinstein's mark for BOTOLIST took advantage of the distinctive character and… [read post]
11 May 2012, 10:31 am
T. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am
He seems to be S-O-L on the SOL (statute of limitations — the deadline by which a lawsuit must be filed.) [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
As soon as you start saying it’s private party v. private party, must go to Article III. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am
California Court Declines to Follow Race Tires, Allows Taxation of eDiscovery Costs - bit.ly/IZoWhW (K&L Gates) Peck Wins By Submission; Parties Get Shot At Title Fight - bit.ly/Jfheio (eLessons Learned) Random Sample Calculations And My Prediction That 300,000 Lawyers Will Be Using Random Sampling By 2022 – bit.ly/IBIaZ5 (Ralph Losey) “Reasonableness” is Key When Assessing E-Discovery Efforts – bit.ly/IZp7d9 (Mike Hamilton)… [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Jeanene L. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:00 am
L. [read post]
8 May 2012, 7:00 pm
China's angst is totally unsurprising and (in my humble opinion) warranted, given two key facts: (1) the United States has now had over a year to implement the Appellate Body's decision and only started working on the "Section 129" compliance determination in the Fall of 2011; and (2) Congress and the President just implemented a law overturning a big US court case (GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
Klee, One Size Fits Some: Single Asset Real Estate Cases, 87 Cornell L. [read post]
