Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 6381 - 6400 of 29,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
If so, how clear must they be about that exercise of state power – or how much can they conceal the state’s role by relying on platforms to prohibit “harmful” content” under Terms of Service? [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:02 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It cites cases including New York Times Co. v Sullivan, which states that “The right of citizens to inquire, to speak and to use information to reach consensus is a precondition to enlightened self-government and a necessary means to protect it. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  In response, many State Medicaid plans (especially Medicaid Advantage plans) have taken steps to make it easier for plan beneficiaries to obtain care by their primary care provider after normal business hours rather than be forced have to seek significantly more expensive hospital emergency room assistance during evenings, weekends and holidays, when their primary caregiver’s offices would normally be closed. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm by Robert Liles
  In response, many State Medicaid plans (especially Medicaid Advantage plans) have taken steps to make it easier for plan beneficiaries to obtain care by their primary care provider after normal business hours rather than be forced have to seek significantly more expensive hospital emergency room assistance during evenings, weekends and holidays, when their primary caregiver’s offices would normally be closed. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:25 am by Bill Drabble
California has adopted a four-stage reopening plan, which progressively relaxes restrictions. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 4:04 pm by Patricia Hughes
Section 49 states that an individual who has contravened or failed to comply with an order or the Act is liable to a maximum fine of $10,000 or imprisonment of up to 6 months or both for a first offence and up to additional fines of up to $1,000 a day if the offence continues (fines increase to a maximum of $25,000 or up to 12 months imprisonment for subsequent offences or both and a maximum of $25,000 for each day the offence continues). [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:40 pm by Giles Peaker
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2020) EWHC 1353 (QB) Flexible tenancies. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:40 am by Angela Mauroni
The Supreme Court agreed, stating that an ERISA participant does not have an “equitable or property interest in the plan. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 6:35 am by Angela Mauroni
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]