Search for: "State v. Price" Results 6381 - 6400 of 13,252
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2008, 2:48 pm
(iv) and (v) are functions of the forward movement and cease—indeed (v) is reversed—as soon as the position fails to improve further. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:08 pm
By Zachary Wadlé On April 19, 2010, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Costco v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am by nmlandon
(directors’ duty to maximize share price in corporate takeover) Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Governance Meinhard v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:55 am by Paul S.O. Barbeau
However, in Zhang v Amaral-Gurgel the Court took a firm stance on the use and abuse of such “lawyer approval” clauses. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:53 am by Jeremy Saland
One of the key cases that guide shoplifting prosecutions in New York City as well as the rest of New York State is People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am by WSLL
As the Court stated in Frangos, fair market value based on comparable sales is determined by “making adjustments for prices of those [comparables] that are more similar or dissimilar to condemned property. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 12:01 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Dec. 4 conference) United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
Writes Scotusblog: "The burden [Justice Tom] Price cited included the Supreme Court's ruling in 2006 in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm by Steven Boutwell
R.S. 38:2212.B(6)(b); Unit prices govern if there is a discrepancy between the base bid total and extended unit pricing. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:16 pm
Writes Scotusblog: "The burden [Justice Tom] Price cited included the Supreme Court's ruling in 2006 in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]