Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Laws in this area are not universal or uniform (even as between states that are parties to the ECHR). [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 4:02 am
USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of UseThe TTAB Issued 42 Precedential Decisions in 2012Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Already v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:47 am
Crucially, however, he held that the mark had in fact acquired a distinctive character and was therefore validly registered. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 5:04 am
It didn’t please everyone though and the tournament stated that as of next year there will be a dress code policy. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:56 am
Breyer This remark was expounded at the Supreme Court earlier this month during a hearing in relation to Star Athletica L.L.C v Varsity Brands, Inc., et al.. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
According to the French IP code, M&S was not entitled to demand the cancellation of those goods and services not cited against it by ISMS, and therefore the claims for cancellation should be accepted as far as they apply to those goods and services cited in the infringement claim but rejected for those not so cited.On the validity of CTM 5410998 SIMPLYRecognizing the need to consider the validity of the marks by reference to the average consumer in all EU member states, the court… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:34 am
The fracas that occurred when COPE was established indicates some expected difficulties with that process - see Tune in live for ANC v COPE name battle. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:10 am
Registered on 14 March 2008). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:25 am
Wizkids/NECA, LLC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
This should also act as a warning to those who might be contemplating registering a mark which is similar to a well-known historic mark, which might still have a reputation even if it has not been in use for a couple of years. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 10:58 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 5:49 pm
Tooley v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 8:24 pm
For example, Bold v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 4:53 am
Last week, the Court granted cert in South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
The case, DRK Photo v. [read post]
