Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2022, 8:19 am
In this post, Hannah Jones, Assistant Professional Support Lawyer in the Tax team at CMS, comments on Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd [2022] UKSC 10, a case which concerns the UK’s pre-2014 tax treatment of manufactured overseas dividends. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
” Missouri v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
These instructions must be "really" important given the extraordinarily "high" number of "unnecessary" quotation marks. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:50 pm
That might help the candidate; for example, perhaps a low LSAT might (despite high undergraduate grades) might be given less weight, since it has less predictive power. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:27 pm
Consider exemptions given to other groups. 3. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:11 pm
However, the judge was of the opinion that everolimus was singled out, and was in fact the "paradigm example" to be used from that class, given that all of the in vitro and in vivo tests referred to everolimus, at least as an example. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 12:16 pm
US v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
As I explain after the jump, Abby is absolutely correct, at least if NFIB Part IV(B) is given a reasonably broad reading. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:13 am
Case citation: Bubble Genius v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:25 am
Last week in Preap v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
In short:"In early April two individuals who had given witness statements (signed statements of truth) which were used at the earlier hearings admitted that the evidence they had given was deliberately fabricated to mislead the court in order to advance the claimant's interests and that they had conspired together to present false evidence and to lie in their witness statements. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
Given the glut of traffic rules, police rarely have to concoct a reason to pull over any driver they choose. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:43 am
In Paquette’s case, since he would have earned a bonus had he been given working notice, the use of the words “active employment” could not be used as an end-run around his claim for the bonus over the pay in lieu of notice period. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:47 am
Costa; Scordino v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
This question was considered inRB (Algeria) v SSHD [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:22 pm
Himber v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:34 am
(The Boathouse v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:27 am
Business v. [read post]
