Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 6381 - 6400 of 21,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Torsten M. Kracht
Those cases were consolidated in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation, 3:15-cv-03747 (Aug. 2015) and are currently stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s review of Robins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
If Stahl is good law, then the state has a simple way of virtually nullifying the Confrontation Clause in any case of a crime against the person: Bring the accuser to a hospital unit and have her make a statement to someone designated as a care-giver. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 11:02 am by Cindy Cohn
In 2020, there was some good judicial news involving NSA secrecy. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:15 am
United States – Officials in 11 states, led by Texas, have sued the U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm by Jason Rantanen
But, in my view, a foreign sale does result in exhaustion if an authorized seller has not explicitly reserved the United States patent rights. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:39 am by Kevin Schad appellate division SDOH
United States, 129 S.Ct. 695 (2009), the Court could not longer find that a presumption of suppression, based upon a Fourth Amendment violation, applied. [read post]
The United States of America (‘US’), one of the treaty’s signatories, has adopted Article 1(A) of the Convention without any substantial reservation, understanding or declaration (‘RUDs’). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
This Blog tries, when the opportunity is presented, to shed light on corporate governance practices from other countries that vary from those in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:40 pm by Dale Carpenter
Were it a final decision on the merits rather than a decision on an interlocutory appeal, Pidgeon would be good candidate for the kind of slap-down summary reversal the Supreme Court dealt the Arkansas high court last Monday in Pavan v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
” In DogsBite the Complainant is located in Texas and the Respondent appears to be a coalition of parties located in the United Kingdom and New York. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
But if the discretionary housing payment scheme is not good enough to justify the discrimination against the [other] households, it is not good enough to justify the discrimination against Ms A’s household either. [read post]