Search for: "University System v. State"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 8,144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2011, 11:16 am
In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
TYLER DICKOVICK University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, c2011 JF60 .D49 2011 See Catalog Chemical industry -- Waste disposal -- United States POLLUTION LIMITS AND POLLUTERS' EFFORTS TO COMPLY: THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT / DIETRICH H. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:11 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:26 am
” In the Stanford Daily, Hiroko Sunamura reports on the university’s response to the Court’s holding in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
TYLER DICKOVICK University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, c2011 JF60 .D49 2011 See Catalog Chemical industry -- Waste disposal -- United States POLLUTION LIMITS AND POLLUTERS' EFFORTS TO COMPLY: THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT / DIETRICH H. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
Rather, United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:54 am
The decision in Leland Stanford Junior Univeristy v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:01 pm
Its test case litigation efforts have all failed - most notably CCH v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm
Basel V. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
It has always been suspected that the tabloid press’s almost universal antipathy towards the 1998 Act, which in theory at least should be popular as it protects citizens against nasty state intrusion, was inspired by the fear that the privacy rights it bolstered, despite the competing right to freedom of expression, would prevent them doing their jobs. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am
It has always been suspected that the tabloid press’s almost universal antipathy towards the 1998 Act, which in theory at least should be popular as it protects citizens against nasty state intrusion, was inspired by the fear that the privacy rights it bolstered, despite the competing right to freedom of expression, would prevent them doing their jobs. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
AL-JEDDA v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
(Patentology) Brazil Testing, testing, 1,2,3 – INPI testing system to allow users to access granted letters patent (IP tango) Canada Trade-mark update: Masterpiece v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 6:13 pm
Coffin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
And much of what the international law community regards as universal human rights, I regard as universalism sheltering under American hegemony, and if hegemony declines, the universalist human rights movement declines with it, even if the movement is the last to understand that. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm
Dave Owen (University of Maine - School of Law) has posted The Mono Lake Decision, the Public Trust Doctrine, and the Administrative State (UC Davis Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:42 pm
As a result, the Patent Reform Act as a whole will not please any of the groups entirely, but is a compromise bill designed to please enough to ensure passage while invigorating the United States patent system. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Back in February, the 8th District, in State v. [read post]
