Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 29,128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2021, 6:04 pm
Justice Myers of the Superior Court of Justice heard a consent motion to transfer a case under Rule 13.1.02 (2) in Polgampalage v Devani. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
IX, § 5; Wells v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:04 am
See NLRB v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The rule of law requires a more well-reasoned, internally consistent, readily comprehensible decision than the Court provided in Fisher. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The "educational benefits of student body diversity," said the Supreme Court in Gratz v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:42 am
” Kimberly Robinson reports at Bloomberg Law that the Supreme Court is entering what Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has called “’flood season’”: “the ‘well-known crunch’ as the end of the U.S. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
I believe that the Supreme Court will decide Smith v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 8:22 am
The Supreme Court has accepted a new case from California, Van de Kamp v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
While we’re waiting for the Supreme Court to issue its preemption ruling in the Bartlett case (possibly as early as 10:00 a.m. today), we thought we’d examine the Court’s recent preemption decisions in non-drug/medical device cases, Hillman v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:11 pm
After Justice Reinvestment, the highest permissible maximum for him was 19 months—well in excess of a year. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
Yesterday in No. 07-330, Greenlaw v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:12 am
" Here is the abstract:This Article considers the significant state court reform developments in the year following the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Caperton v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
I think that Justice King is on target here. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
You'd know full well that if you left, they'd simply chase you, and force you to pull over. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
In overshadowed, but potentially no less significant news, the House of Lords approved amendments to the “secret courts” Justice and Security Bill; the Joint Committee on Human Rights reported on the Crime and Courts Bill, and we have another round of arguments for and against the UK’s continuing association with the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:18 am
In its recent Pro-Plaintiff decision in the case of Bert Company v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
Court Rules, comment 3 on R. 4:42-2 (2011) (citing Ford v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
’ The Court of Justice made quite short work of this reference. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 8:55 am
During oral arguments in Gall v. [read post]
