Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 6381 - 6400
of 60,494
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2006, 8:13 am
Science and the Law Blog excorriates the First Circuit for its holding in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm
Red-Baron-Franklin Park, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
” Grannis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 pm
In Sciborski v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:50 am
As states across the country start to reopen their economies after COVID-19 shutdowns, many businesses are likewise preparing to have employees return to work. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:47 am
Caselman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:56 pm
In August, our law firm sought and obtained summary judgment on wage and hour issues in Alladin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 9:02 am
The determination of who is exempt v. non-exempt isn’t based on an employee’s job title, but rather the nature of the work he or she does. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 9:00 am
The federal district court hearing the case agreed with the ASM to conditional certify the overtime case as a collective action pursuant to the United States Supreme Court case Hoffman v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:47 am
Caselman v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 11:34 am
Needless to say, the District Court’s decision – which was handed down in Daniel Cotto, Jr. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 11:44 am
Contents include:Nikos Lavranos & Ahmed Mazlom, The Investment Treaty Implications of Covid-19 Responses by States Ronan O’Reilly, EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment – A Rebalancing of Investment Relations Lawrence Northmore-Ball, Jennifer Harvey, & Amber Courtier, Micula v Romania – A Saga of Lasting Significance Ondřej Svoboda, UNCITRAL Working Group III and Multilateral Investment Court – Troubled Waters for EU Normative… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
United States (No. 09-6822) requires the Court to further sort through the implications and consequences of its landmark ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:16 pm
With the increasing likelihood that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:11 am
It does not.The case is Sanderson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
I remain delighted by the writing in Judge Stucky's opinion for the court in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
I have worked with Sam, learned from his scholarship, and have great respect for his integrity. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 9:38 am
Mahanoy was an 8-1 decision, and I hope NRA v. [read post]
