Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 6401 - 6420 of 11,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum -… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat)   United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"   "Strict privity, as applied in the context of estate planning malpractice actions, is a minority rule in the United States [FN1]. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
’” Finally, in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 11:46 am
  In another notable decision on the grey area separating the interests of a free press and those of law enforcement, United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am by Broc Romanek
The stockholder in VeriFone had brought derivative litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
” Records on file with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) show that on August 5, 2013, Tesla Motors, Inc. filed a trademark application for “Model E,” in several classes of goods, including that for “Automobiles and structural parts therefor. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 3:01 pm
Litton Indus., Inc., 410 Mass. 15, 23 (1991); Columbia State Bank v. [read post]