Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 6401 - 6420 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am by paperstreet
Slip Opn 20-21, citing Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 43, 120 S. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:54 am
Typically, the homeowner (Defendant) has 20 days to respond from the date the paperwork was served on the defendant. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 12:55 pm by Ron
We reasonably fear, however, having to defend that in front of a judge who does not understand the issue. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
   On very short notice, I was summoned to City Hall for a meeting with Mayor Michael Bloomberg and the chair of his judicial screening committee, who was called on to defend his committee’s recommendation of the judge. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:05 am by Fiona de Londras
Last night I attended and spoke at a public meeting organised by Action on X, a lobbying and campaigning organisation established to pressurise the government into introducing legislation for the X Case (Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1), which is now 20 years old. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
  This outcome does underscore the fundamental tension that may underlie many indemnification provisions and agreements. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:02 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Renaissance Equity Holdings, LLC, No. 1:12-cv-00350-BMC, a case in which the NLRB is seeking a federal court injunction to declare an end to an employer lockout, the Defendant is contesting the action on the grounds that because three of the Board’s five members have not been validly appointed, the Board has no authority to act.Paulsen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Puns aside, Exhibit A for that statement is the defendant in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
What was really going on and how does that get resolved? [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am by Wessen Jazrawi
 February 19, 2012 Adam Wagner Analysis | Court of Appeal upholds hotel gay discrimination ruling – Marina Wheeler February 19, 2012 1 Crown Office Row Former Top Judge hits back at current Top Judge February 17, 2012 Richard Mumford Article 8 challenge to enhanced criminal records regime fails at first instance – Robin Hopkins February 16, 2012 1 Crown Office Row Strasbourg in the primordial soup February 15,… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:53 am by admin
(b) The division shall deny or suspend a person’s license for the denial and suspension periods in effect: (i) prior to July 1, 2009, for an offense that was committed prior to July 1, 2009; or (ii) from July 1, 2009, through June 30, 2011, if: (A) the person was 20 years 6 months of age or older but under 21 years of age at the time of arrest; and (B) the conviction under Subsection (2) is for an offense that was committed on or after July 1, 2009,… [read post]