Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 6401 - 6420 of 13,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 8:38 am by Jeralyn
The second order, applied for on January 30 and issued on February 1, was extended on February 28 and 29 until March 21. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Foster Farms had come in for criticism because the company took so long to recall any product during the outbreak, which began on March 1, 2013, before it spread to 29 states and Puerto Rico. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 2:15 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The Judgment The ECJ ruled that the statement of opposition to the European Order can only produce the effects prescribed by Regulation No 1896/2006. 29 [Regulation No 1896/2006] is not adversarial. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:06 am
Furthermore, it does not help to reinforce the EU's integration process, and is thus contrary to the second subparagraph of Article 20(1) TEU [This appears to overlap with 3.1 in the Spanish case, though the latter does not specifically allude to the challenged Decision not helping to reinforce the EU integration process]".If you want to persuade the UK government to make any submissions in the Spanish case, you must email the UK IPO here before 29… [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 2:27 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Unlike the proposed CONSENT JUDGMENT between the CFPB and the Trusts themselves, this order does not require court approval, and was effective immediately. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:45 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The ASBH annual conference is in Portland, Oregon from October 26 to 29, 2022. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Intellogist Blog) Patent searching by classification (Intellogist Blog)   Global – Copyright Complete ACTA text finally leaked (Ars Technica) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) Toward an ACTA super-structure: How ACTA may replace WIPO (Michael Geist) ACTA’s anti-camcording provision faces opposition from Australia, NZ, Switzerland (Michael Geist) ACTA’s de minimis provision: Countering the iPod searching border guard fears (Michael Geist) New ACTA leaks: IP categories and border… [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:42 pm
The definition of transfer and discharge here applies to movement to a bed outside the certified facility (including differently licensed beds in the same physical plant), but does not apply to movement to a different bed in the certified facility. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm by MOTP
HOUSE BELOW GREEN TREE SERVICING, L.L.C.; WALTER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; BEST INSURORS, INCORPORATED; MID STATE CAPITAL, L.L.C.; MID STATE TRUST II; MID STATE TRUST III; MID STATE TRUST IV; MID STATE TRUST V; MID STATE TRUST VI; MID STATE TRUST VII; MID STATE TRUST VIII; MID STATE TRUST IX; MID STATE TRUST X; MID STATE TRUST XI; WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2004-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL CORPORATION 2005-1 TRUST; MID-STATE CAPITAL… [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
Further, the evidence does not establish that the Employer is a seasonal employer. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:13 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El ancho de la zanja o zapata es de aproximadamente 61 centímetros (2 pies) y 33 centímetros (1 pie) de profundidad”. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:01 am by oliver
Claim 1 of this request read:1. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm by Giles Peaker
Mrs Nur does not work because of her caring responsibilities for Z and is therefore in receipt of state welfare benefits. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§11–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]